Books, QuotesJanuary 24, 2008 6:01 pm
From the point of view of the story, it is easy to see that Dante placed the Giants here, not merely to furnish a means of transport from Malbowges to the depth of the Well, but, artistically, to provide a little light releif between the sickening horrors of the last bowges of Fraud Simple and the still greater, but wholly different, horrors of the pit of Treachery. But allegorically, what do they signify? In one sense they are images of Pride; the Giants who rebelled against Jove typify the pride of Satan who rebelled against God. But they may also, I think, be taken as the images of the blind forces which remain in the soul, and in society, when the “general bond of love” is disolved and the “good of the intellect” wholly withdrawn, and when nothing remains but blocks of primitive mass-emotion, fit to be the “executives of Mars” and the tools of treachery. Nimrod is a braggart stupidity; Ephialtes, a senseless rage; Antaeus, a brainless vanity: one may call them the doom of nonsense, violence, and triviality, overtaking a civilization in which the whole natural order is abrogated.

-From Dorothy Sayers explanatory material (”The Images”) on Canto XXXI of her translation of The Inferno. Here she is explaining the literary and allegorical meanings of the Giants that guard the well that leads down into the final level of hell and residence of Lucifer himself. I am always amazed by Ms. Sayers ability to casually make the most profound observation as if it were really nothing but common sense.

Politics, Ethics 5:32 am

FetusThe best estimates are that Americans murder about 3,000 babies per day - and it’s legal. The government allows citizens of our country to murder 3,000 children every day with impunity. That’s a 9/11 every day. We need to let that sink in.

It is astounding to me that Americans can, with no sense of irony, lament the tragedies of Nazi Germany without considering this fact. As a postmillenialist (and thus as one who hopes for a future in which our children see more clearly than we do) I have often wondered how our children and children’s children will view us. Continue Reading…

Politics, Ethics 4:51 am

Doug Wilson got me all stirred up so I decided to post.

With regard to political candidates: I often hear people say that the President has no authority over the abortion issue, so why make it a factor in our voting?

a.) This is not true. The President appoints members of the Supreme Court. Guess who is responsible for Roe vs. Wade? Guess who can change it? Continue Reading…

Theology, Politics 4:27 am

So, I’m driving home from teaching my class today and listening to NPR (which I know many of you regard as my first mistake, but I do it frequently and am not likely to stop) and I’m just blown away by what I’m hearing. I don’t know why. I’ve heard it all many times before, but today it just got me. Continue Reading…

Theology, Politics 2:54 am

Doug Wilson nails the abortion issue here. This may well motivate me to blog a bit about this. I generally am annoyed by evangelical rhetoric (not because I disagree, necessarily, with their conclusions, but because I am dismayed by the illogic of their arguments and the vitriol at all the wrong things), but when it comes to this issue I guess I’m just an fundy. I’ll pretty much defend anyone that is standing up and screaming that murdering our children at the rate of 3,000 a day with the full sanction of the government is evil and satanic.